Skip to main content

Lee v. United States Bank N.A.

Lee v. United States Bank N.A.

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not err in concluding that the anti-modification provision applied toappellee's secured claim as the claim was secured by appellant's real property. (11th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Discretionary Provisions; Modification of Claimholders' Rights

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lee v. United States Bank N.A. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 23, 2024 , LexisNexis #0724-097