Skip to main content

In re Jester

In re Jester

Ruling
Debtor was awarded damages for creditor's willful violation of automatic stay.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a motion for contempt of the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) against creditor, the Philadelphia Parking Authority ("PPA"), for the latter's postpetition conduct in seizing and impounding debtor's vehicle and selling it to recover the costs of unpaid, prepetition, parking fines and storage costs.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jester Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 12, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-085