Skip to main content

Stalker v. Pierce (In re Pierce)

Stalker v. Pierce (In re Pierce)

Ruling
State court judgment based on order by debtor, creditor's guardian and board of health member, for demolition of creditor's house was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Judgment creditor filed a complaint against chapter 7 debtor seeking a determination that a state court judgment was non-dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(4) and /or (a)(6). That judgment determined that the debtor, who was the creditor's court appointed guardian, breached her fiduciary duties to the creditor and violated his due process rights. The creditor moved for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stalker v. Pierce (In re Pierce) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 30, 2013 , LexisNexis #0613-050