Skip to main content

Sugar v. Eimstad (In re Eimstad)

Sugar v. Eimstad (In re Eimstad)

Ruling
Intentional tort judgment for assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Creditor filed a complaint against debtor seeking a determination that a debt was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(6). The creditor filed a motion for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sugar v. Eimstad (In re Eimstad) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 24, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-091