Skip to main content

Hokanen v. Hopper (In re Hopper)

Hokanen v. Hopper (In re Hopper)

Ruling
Finding of nondischargeability reversed due to trustee's failure to demonstrate that debtor was a fiduciary.
Procedural posture

Respondent bankruptcy trustee of a real estate client of appellant bankruptcy debtor brought an adversary proceeding against the debtor seeking a determination that a debt was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(4) based on the debtor's fraud in a fiduciary capacity. The debtor appealed the judgment in favor of the trustee entered in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California based on collateral estoppel.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hokanen v. Hopper (In re Hopper) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 16, 2011 , LexisNexis #0611-123