Skip to main content

Hill v. Snyder

Hill v. Snyder

Ruling
Denial of discharge following extension of time to object was properly affirmed as bankruptcycourt did not abuse its discretion by finding that the extension was necessary. (8th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Fraudulent Transfer or Concealment of Property;

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hill v. Snyder Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 29, 2019 , LexisNexis #0519-092