Skip to main content

Pearson v. Howard (In re Howard)

Pearson v. Howard (In re Howard)

Ruling
Attorney debtor's judgment debt was deemed nondischargeable since attorney debtor's conduct constituted a fidudiary defalcation.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor brought an adversary proceeding against defendant bankruptcy debtor, an attorney, seeking a declaration that the attorney's judgment debt to the creditor for legal malpractice was not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523 based on fraud, false representation, fiduciary defalcation, and willful and malicious conduct. The bankruptcy court conducted a trial.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pearson v. Howard (In re Howard) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 22, 2006 , LexisNexis #0406-091