Skip to main content

Michaud v. Alblitt & Carulo PC (In re Michaud)

Michaud v. Alblitt & Carulo PC (In re Michaud)

Ruling
Post-confirmation postponement of foreclosure sale while debtor's plan payments were current and no motion for relief from stay was pending violated stay.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor filed a complaint against defendant, agent for a creditor, seeking damages under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h) for defendant's alleged violations of the automatic stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Michaud v. Alblitt & Carulo PC (In re Michaud) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on January 16, 2007 , LexisNexis #0307-091