- 11 U.S.C.
eCast Settlement Corp. v. May (In re May)
Jan
28
2008
Ruling
Creditor's objection that plan did not utilize all of debtors'disposable income overruled given evidence of decrease in income after debtors originally prepared Schedule I.
Procedural posture
An unsecured creditor of chapter 13 debtors filed an objection to the confirmation of the debtors'plan, asserting that the debtors were not applying all of their projected disposable income towards payment to unsecured creditors for the applicable commitment period of the plan as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of eCast Settlement Corp. v. May (In re May) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: