Skip to main content

In re Mammola

In re Mammola

Ruling
Debtor could not reopen converted chapter 7 case to add creditor on eve of state court trial.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a motion to reopen his chapter 7 case for the purpose of amending his schedules. Specifically, he sought to amend Schedule F to add a creditor to the list of creditors holding unsecured nonpriority claims. The creditor objected, asserting that he was not informed of the bankruptcy case because the debtor failed to amend Schedule F upon conversion of his chapter 11 case to a chapter 7 case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mammola Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 14, 2009 , LexisNexis #0110-134