Winter Leadership Conference | December 5-7 | Rancho Palos Verdes , CA Register Today View Schedule

§ 362(b)(2)

Welsch, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's ex-wife did not need to obtain stay relief in order to seek modification of apreviously entered order for child support in order to collect college expenses. (Bankr. N.D.Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Welsch, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 30,2019, LexisNexis #0919-076

Dougherty-Kelsay, In re

Ruling: 
Family court's wage garnishment order was permitted regardless of whether the garnishedwages were property of the debtor or her estate.. (Bankr. E.D. Ky.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dougherty-Kelsay, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 23,2019, LexisNexis #0619-083

Pence, In re

Ruling: 
Court lifted stay to allow divorce court to either reaffirm its order dividing property that was subject to the stay or relitigate the division of estate property. (Bankr. D. Utah)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pence, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 14,2018, LexisNexis #0318-095

O'Brien, In re--O'Brien v. Skubic

Ruling: 
Automatic stay did not apply to the service of a contempt motion to the extent it sought payment of the fee award by the debtor. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of O'Brien, In re--O'Brien v. Skubic. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 21,2017, LexisNexis #0817-092

Cascone, In re

Ruling: 
Order that established the debtor's child support arrearage was not void as a violation of the automatic stay because the collection action was excepted from the stay. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cascone, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 18,2017, LexisNexis #0717-038

In re Rose

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy debtor's former spouse not entitled for relief from stay as her Employee StockOption Plan was not a property of the debtor's bankruptcy estate. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rose. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 22,2016, LexisNexis #0117-097

In re Holland

Ruling: 
Debtor’s former spouse who had not filed a proof of claim was not entitled to relief from stay.(Bankr. E.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Holland. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 22,2016, LexisNexis #1016-077

Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Gonzalez (In re Gonzalez)

Ruling: 
State department of revenue properly held in contempt for violating terms of plan. (11th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Gonzalez (In re Gonzalez). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 11,2016, LexisNexis #0916-005

In re Enright

Ruling: 
Stay lifted for sole purpose of requesting state court ruling on recoupment of alleged child support overpayments by debtor's former spouse.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Enright. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 13,2015, LexisNexis #0915-007

Caldwell v. Dewoskin

Ruling: 
Court barred from considering alleged stay violations by Rooker-Feldman doctrine due to state court's prior orders.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Caldwell v. Dewoskin. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 27,2014, LexisNexis #0714-114

Pages

Subscribe to § 362(b)(2)