§ 362(b)(2)

Valentine, In re--Valentine v. Valentine

Ruling: 
Exception to stay did not apply as domestic support obligations had been determined to bepre-petition debt and last pre-petition date modification request had been denied by the statecourt. (Bankr. E.D. Mo.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Valentine, In re--Valentine v. Valentine. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 17,2020, LexisNexis #0220-077

Doughty, In re

Ruling: 
Court dismissed debtor's request for relief from violations of the automatic stay as the stay didnot apply to domestic support obligations. (B.A.P. 8th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Doughty, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 17,2019, LexisNexis #0120-077

Welsch, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's ex-wife did not need to obtain stay relief in order to seek modification of apreviously entered order for child support in order to collect college expenses. (Bankr. N.D.Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Welsch, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 30,2019, LexisNexis #0919-076

Dougherty-Kelsay, In re

Ruling: 
Family court's wage garnishment order was permitted regardless of whether the garnishedwages were property of the debtor or her estate.. (Bankr. E.D. Ky.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dougherty-Kelsay, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 23,2019, LexisNexis #0619-083

Pence, In re

Ruling: 
Court lifted stay to allow divorce court to either reaffirm its order dividing property that was subject to the stay or relitigate the division of estate property. (Bankr. D. Utah)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pence, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 14,2018, LexisNexis #0318-095

O'Brien, In re--O'Brien v. Skubic

Ruling: 
Automatic stay did not apply to the service of a contempt motion to the extent it sought payment of the fee award by the debtor. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of O'Brien, In re--O'Brien v. Skubic. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 21,2017, LexisNexis #0817-092

Cascone, In re

Ruling: 
Order that established the debtor's child support arrearage was not void as a violation of the automatic stay because the collection action was excepted from the stay. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cascone, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 18,2017, LexisNexis #0717-038

In re Rose

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy debtor's former spouse not entitled for relief from stay as her Employee StockOption Plan was not a property of the debtor's bankruptcy estate. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rose. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 22,2016, LexisNexis #0117-097

In re Holland

Ruling: 
Debtor’s former spouse who had not filed a proof of claim was not entitled to relief from stay.(Bankr. E.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Holland. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 22,2016, LexisNexis #1016-077

Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Gonzalez (In re Gonzalez)

Ruling: 
State department of revenue properly held in contempt for violating terms of plan. (11th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Gonzalez (In re Gonzalez). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 11,2016, LexisNexis #0916-005

Pages

Subscribe to § 362(b)(2)