§ 362(c)(2)

Acemla De P.R., In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's urgent motion to show cause denied where automatic stay was terminated andcreditor was no longer subject to restrictions imposed by court in an earlier order modifyingand conditioning the stay. (Bankr. D.P.R.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Acemla De P.R., In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on March 01,2019, LexisNexis #0419-054

Maes, In re

Ruling: 
Court denied debtor's motion as reimposing the automatic stay upon reopening the cases would contravene the explicit provisions of the bankruptcy code governing termination of the automatic stay. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Maes, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 31,2018, LexisNexis #0918-039

In re Preferred Prop. Group LLC

Ruling: 
Payments to debtor's attorneys pursuant to cash collateral order could not be recalled on FDIC's contention that the order was improperly issued.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Preferred Prop. Group LLC. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on March 31,2015, LexisNexis #0415-077

U.S. Bank v. Robinson (In re Robinson)

Ruling: 
Postdismissal, pre-reinstatement foreclosure did not violate stay.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of U.S. Bank v. Robinson (In re Robinson). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 24,2014, LexisNexis #0315-040

In re Langenderfer

This proceeding was before the court on debtor's motion for sanctions for an alleged violation of the 11 U.S.C.S. § 362 automatic stay, and a creditor's response. In her motion, debtor alleged that the creditor violated the automatic stay by attempting to collect a discharged debt.
Ruling: 
Postdischarge collection of nondischargeable postpetition condominium fees did not violate stay.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Langenderfer. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 23,2012, LexisNexis #0512-045

In re Mendez

A Chapter 11 debtor filed a motion to administratively close his case in order to avoid the hardship of quarterly fees owed to the U.S. trustee (UST) under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1930(a)(6). The Chapter 11 plan was already confirmed and payments to creditors had commenced.
Ruling: 
Order issued in case with substantially consummated plan to provide relief from quarterly fees.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mendez. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 26,2011, LexisNexis #1111-109

In Storozhenko

A state court receiver filed a motion seeking a determination that the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a) was not in effect to preclude him from attempting to collect a pre-petition civil contempt judgment against a Chapter 7 debtor from property that was not part of the bankruptcy estate.
Ruling: 
Stay remained in effect with respect to prepetition civil contempt judgment that had not yet been held nondischargeable.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In Storozhenko. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 16,2011, LexisNexis #1011-038

Hamel-Schwulst v. Negrotto

Plaintiff homeowner sued defendant insurer, surety, and other individuals, alleging fraud, misuse of a notary seal, alteration of a security instrument, and violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. After one individual filed for bankruptcy, a magistrate judge recommended that the action be stayed as to him. Before an amended recommendation was referred to the district court, the homeowner moved for a stay.
Ruling: 
Magistrate's recommendation that action against individual was subject to stay vacated upon notice of discharge.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hamel-Schwulst v. Negrotto. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 05,2009, LexisNexis #0909-042

In re Agundez

In debtors'chapter 7 case, movant bank, on April 23, 2007, filed a motion, notice, and declaration requesting that the court vacate the automatic stay to permit it to foreclose upon real property.
Ruling: 
Automatic stay expired as to debtors in personam upon discharge, but relief from stay was necessary as to the estate in order to allow foreclosure to proceed.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Agundez. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Morales

A chapter 13 debtor filed a motion to extend or impose the automatic stay, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(4). The United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") filed a resistance to the motion.
Ruling: 
Court refused to extend stay where debtor's third bankruptcy was severely underfunded.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Morales. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Pages

Subscribe to § 362(c)(2)