§ 726

Ton, In re

Ruling: 
Proceeds from the sale of vehicles co-owned by debtor with former spouse should be used topay administrative claims. (Bankr. E.D. La.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ton, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 04,2021, LexisNexis #0621-066

Jones, In re

Ruling: 
Claim would be allowed as a tardily filed claim entitled to distribution as the deadline toassert a priority claim entitled to first distribution status had not passed. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jones, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 24,2021, LexisNexis #0521-015

Clouse, In re

Ruling: 
Tardily filed unsecured proof of claim allowed but subordinated to timely filed claims. (Bankr.D. Neb.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Clouse, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 29,2020, LexisNexis #1220-069

Gaffney, In re

Ruling: 
Creditor's tardy claim could not be allowed as creditor received actual notice of thebankruptcy filing in time to inquire, learn of the claims filing deadline, and file a timelyclaim. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gaffney, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 29,2020, LexisNexis #1120-044

Racing Servs., In re--North Dakota ex rel. Stenehjem v. Bala

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court erred in ruling that claim assigned to the state was barred by laches aslaches did not apply to tardily-filed claims that were filed in time to permit distribution.(B.A.P. 8th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Racing Servs., In re--North Dakota ex rel. Stenehjem v. Bala. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on September 16,2020, LexisNexis #1020-090

NETtel Corp., In re

Ruling: 
Trustee and his law firm were could not lower required disgorgement where they had failed tomake clear that all professionals would be subject to disgorgement to the extent necessary toachieve a pro rata distribution. (Bankr. D.D.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of NETtel Corp., In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on April 28,2020, LexisNexis #0620-068

Bessey, In re

Ruling: 
Tardy debtor-filed claims on behalf of the IRS were not entitled to distribution and debtorfiled claims for post-petition taxes were disallowed. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bessey, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 31,2020, LexisNexis #0520-094

Zimpher, In re

Ruling: 
Chapter 7 debtors were not entitled to a claim based on post-petition debt payment that wouldhave a higher priority than their right to distribution of excess funds. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Zimpher, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 27,2019, LexisNexis #1119-071

Marvelay, In re

Ruling: 
Motion for approval of agreement was granted as the agreement allowed trustee toredistribute funds that would be payable to the State to those injured consumers who hadfiled claims. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Marvelay, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 23,2019, LexisNexis #0919-068

Franklin, In re

Ruling: 
Court noted that it was inappropriate for the judiciary to bear the expense of a second notice to creditors who have otherwise sat on their rights and shown no interest in participating in a distribution from the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Franklin, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 26,2018, LexisNexis #1118-052

Pages

Subscribe to § 726