§ 524(c)(1)

Smith, In re

Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement could not be executed and filed after discharge. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Smith, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 14,2019, LexisNexis #0519-016

Semans, In re

Ruling: 
Court denied debtors' motion to vacate where there was no statutory basis to vacate the discharge order for the purpose of filing a post-discharge reaffirmation agreement. (Bankr. W.D.N.Y.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Semans, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 29,2018, LexisNexis #1018-047

Judson, In re

Ruling: 
Motion to reopen case to file a reaffirmation agreement denied as reaffirmation agreement must be made before the debtor receives a discharge. (Bankr. C.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Judson, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 13,2018, LexisNexis #0818-103

In re Eastep

Ruling: 
Debtors' motion to reopen chapter 7 case denied as discharge has been entered prior to thereaffirmation agreement. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Eastep. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 06,2017, LexisNexis #0217-038

In re Newell

Debtor filed a motion to reopen her chapter 7 case for the purpose of filing a reaffirmation agreement relating to debt secured by debtor's motor vehicle.
Ruling: 
Motion to reopen case to file reaffirmation agreement for motor vehicle debt denied.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Newell. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 17,2013, LexisNexis #0713-056

In re Lucious

In debtors' chapter 7 case, the court held a hearing on a creditor's Motion to Extend Time to File a Reaffirmation Agreement. Its motion was premised on the terms of Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4008(a) and general principles of equity.
Ruling: 
Creditor could not extend time to file reaffirmation agreement entered into after debtor's discharge.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lucious. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 01,2012, LexisNexis #0912-013

In re Nichols

In a chapter 7 bankruptcy, a creditor moved to reopen the case and set aside the discharge in order to file a reaffirmation agreement. The debtors filed a response consenting to the motion. The reaffirmation agreement was signed after the discharge was entered. The motion to reopen was filed more than a month after the deadline to file reaffirmation agreements and almost a month after the discharge was entered.
Ruling: 
Creditor could not seek to vacate discharge in order to file a post-discharge reaffirmation agreement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nichols. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 29,2010, LexisNexis #1210-085

In re Young

A debtor filed a motion to reopen a chapter 7 bankruptcy case to file a reaffirmation agreement with a creditor.
Ruling: 
Court lacked power to approve reaffirmation agreement once discharge was entered.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Young. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 29,2007, LexisNexis #1207-118

Pages

Subscribe to § 524(c)(1)