Annual Spring Meeting | April 11-14 | Washington, D.C. Register Today View Schedule

§ 109(e)

Aparicio, In re

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy debtor ineligible for chapter 13 relief as the amount his ex-wife claimed under a marital settlement agreement, which was incorporated into a dissolution judgment, exceeded the eligibility limits for unsecured debts. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Aparicio, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 23,2018, LexisNexis #1018-033

Bugeaud, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was ineligible to be a debtor under chapter 13 as the total unsecured debt exceeded the allowable amount. (Bankr. E.D. La.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bugeaud, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 27,2018, LexisNexis #1018-034

Bernhard, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was ineligible to be a chapter 13 debtor as his liquidated unsecured debt exceeded the limit after adding a guaranty that was deemed liquidated. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bernhard, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 03,2018, LexisNexis #0918-032

Petty, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors did not qualify for relief under chapter 13 as the debtors' unsecured debts exceededthe eligibility limits of 11 U.S.C. § 109(e). (Bankr. E.D. Tex.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Petty, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 24,2018, LexisNexis #0718-001

Bosserman, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was ineligible for a chapter 13 relief as he owed more than $394,725 in liquidated,noncontingent, unsecured debt. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bosserman, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 09,2018, LexisNexis #0618-032

Fioriglio, In re

Ruling: 
Court ruled that debtor was ineligible to be a debtor under chapter 13 as his secured debts exceeded the limit imposed by § 109(e). (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Fioriglio, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 27,2018, LexisNexis #0518-094

Mendenhall, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was not eligible for chapter 13 relief as the amount of debtor's noncontingent,liquidated unsecured debt exceeded the debt limits found in § 109(e). (Bankr. D. Idaho)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mendenhall, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 17,2017, LexisNexis #1117-092

Green, In re

Ruling: 
Chapter 13 case dismissed as the debts exceeded the statutory limits. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Green, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 27,2017, LexisNexis #0917-034

Durov, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's motion to dismiss debtor's case was granted where debtor was not eligible under chapter 13 for not having a sufficiently stable and regular income to enable him to make payments under a plan. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Durov, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 10,2017, LexisNexis #0417-031

Wilkins, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors are eligible for chapter 13 relief because the bankruptcy court lacks certainty to inferthat debtors' automobile claims may be counted as unsecured for eligibility purposes. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wilkins, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 15,2017, LexisNexis #0317-061

Pages

Subscribe to § 109(e)