§ 522(b)(3)(A)

Freed, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor could not claim homestead exemption since the mortgage specifically allowed for thehomestead to be liable for the debts. (Bankr. N.D. Iowa)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Freed, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 24,2020, LexisNexis #0620-035

Cline, In re--Helber v. Cline

Ruling: 
Chapter 7 trustee's motion to compel turnover of proceeds from debtors' pre-petition sale oftheir residence was denied as trustee failed to make a timely objection to the exemptionclaimed by debtors. (Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cline, In re--Helber v. Cline. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 01,2020, LexisNexis #0520-082

Wallwork, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's objection to debtor’s Idaho homestead exemption sustained where debtor wasrequired to claim Maryland exemptions. (Bankr. D. Idaho)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wallwork, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 20,2020, LexisNexis #0420-012

Broder, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee failed to sustain his burden proving that debtor was not entitled to state lawexemptions. (Bankr. D. Me.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Broder, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 14,2019, LexisNexis #0519-007

Sheehan v. Ash

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court's denial of the trustee's objection to exemptions claimed by the debtors wasaffirmed as debtors were authorized to utilize state scheme to exempt their West Virginiaproperty. (4th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sheehan v. Ash. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 04,2018, LexisNexis #0618-007

Felix, In re

Ruling: 
Appellate panel affirmed court's order denying debtors' Ohio homestead exemption as the debtors changed their professed housing plans when they became aware of a recording error. (6th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Felix, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 06,2018, LexisNexis #0518-038

In re Felix

Ruling: 
Trustee's objection to homestead exemption sustained as debtors' change in housing planswas a tactic to shield a valuable asset, rather than a valid assertion of domicile. (Bankr. S.D.Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Felix. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 23,2017, LexisNexis #0217-083

In re Keifert

The chapter 7 trustee objected to exemptions claimed by debtors under California law because, he asserted, debtors were domiciled in Missouri for the relevant time period and had to claim Missouri exemptions under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(b)(3)(A).
Ruling: 
Debtor domiciled in filing state for 730 days prior to petition date could not claim out of state exemptions based on periodic military service.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Keifert. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 22,2013, LexisNexis #0413-120

In re Shell

Chapter 7 trustee objected to the exemptions claimed by debtor.
Ruling: 
Debtor who resided in an "opt out" state for majority of 180 day period before 730 day prepetition period could not elect federal exemptions.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Shell. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 14,2012, LexisNexis #0912-077

Pages

Subscribe to § 522(b)(3)(A)