§ 1329

Roebuck, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was not eligible to amend Chapter 13 plan to provide for a term beyond five years asthe plan had not been confirmed before the date of enactment of the CARES Act. (Bankr. W.D.Pa.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Roebuck, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 03,2020, LexisNexis #1020-045

Guillen, In re--Whaley v. Guillen

Ruling: 
Court approved the modification of debtor's plan without showing of changed circumstances.(11th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Guillen, In re--Whaley v. Guillen. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 25,2020, LexisNexis #1020-022

Bridges, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor, whose Chapter 13 plan was not yet confirmed, did not qualify under CARES Actprovision to modify her plan to include a term beyond five years. (Bankr. S.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bridges, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 30,2020, LexisNexis #0920-048

Brown, In re--Brown v. Viegelahn

Ruling: 
Court confirmation order vacated due to bankruptcy court imposed conditions prohibitingcertain modifications of the Chapter 13 plan. (5th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Brown, In re--Brown v. Viegelahn. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 08,2020, LexisNexis #0720-074

Berkley, In re--Berkley v. Burchard

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in granting trustee's motion to modify theconfirmed plan to increase payments to unsecured creditors. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Berkley, In re--Berkley v. Burchard. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 17,2020, LexisNexis #0620-047

Beauboeuf, In re

Ruling: 
Motion to prepay plan payments was granted as the motion made no changes to the plan andtherefore was not a modification. (Bankr. W.D. La.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Beauboeuf, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 10,2020, LexisNexis #0420-072

Black, In re--Black v. Leavitt

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court erred in confirming modified plan requiring debtor to turn over to trusteeany excess in sale proceeds specified in the original plan. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Black, In re--Black v. Leavitt. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 31,2019, LexisNexis #0220-048

Schroeder, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was allowed to bifurcate an undersecured mortgage claim on her principal residence asthe last payment on the original payment schedule was due before the final payment underthe Chapter 13 plan. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schroeder, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 30,2019, LexisNexis #1219-023

Scholl, In re

Ruling: 
Motion for modification denied as it failed to satisfy the best interests and good faith tests.(Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Scholl, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 23,2019, LexisNexis #1019-095

Ray, In re

Ruling: 
Court denied counsel's application for additional attorney fees as the Bankruptcy Codeforbids modification after completion of payments under the plan. (Bankr. W.D. Mich.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ray, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 01,2019, LexisNexis #0919-023

Pages

Subscribe to § 1329