§ 1329

Perine, In re

Ruling: 
Court declined to modify the plan to increase the percentage on unsecured claims as theinsurance proceeds were a substitute for the wrecked vehicle, not new assets or valuecoming into the estate. (Bankr. S.D. Ala.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Perine, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 28,2021, LexisNexis #1021-021

Borca, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's motion to modify plan was allowed because sufficient grounds existed to increasedebtors' plan payments in accordance with their increased ability to repay creditors. (Bankr.E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Borca, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 02,2021, LexisNexis #0921-072

Harbin, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors' proposed plan modification was permissible due to CARES Act provision thatallowed extension of plan term for up to seven years. (Bankr. E.D. Mich.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harbin, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 27,2020, LexisNexis #0521-020

Nobles, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's plan modification was approved where an increase in payments for a below-medianincome debtor after 36 months of a five-year plan was reasonable. (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nobles, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 26,2021, LexisNexis #0421-049

Winnegrad, In re

Ruling: 
Issues of good faith and whether debtors will be able to make all payments due were relevantto confirmation of modified plan. (Bankr. D.N.J.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Winnegrad, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 21,2021, LexisNexis #0221-095

Robinson, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's request to modify and extend her confirmed plan was denied as her plan wasoriginally confirmed four days after the enactment of the CARES Act. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Robinson, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 08,2020, LexisNexis #0121-100

Davenport, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's motion to modify his plan was granted as under the modified plan more thansufficient funds would be available to complete payment of the allowed secured claim plusthe IRS's claim. (Bankr. D.D.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Davenport, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 24,2020, LexisNexis #0121-045

Whitfield, In re

Ruling: 
Motion to modify the debtor's Chapter 13 plan was allowed as trust proceeds receivedfollowing death of debtor’s mother were properly included in the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr.E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Whitfield, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 16,2020, LexisNexis #1220-021

Gilbert, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors' motions to modify their plan granted due to material financial hardship resultingfrom COVID-19. (Bankr. E.D. La.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gilbert, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 27,2020, LexisNexis #1120-073

Gentry, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's motion to modify his confirmed plan was denied as the proposed modification didnot fall within the scope of the four limited circumstances identified in § 1329(a). (Bankr. E.D.Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gentry, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 24,2020, LexisNexis #1120-023

Pages

Subscribe to § 1329