Winter Leadership Conference | December 5-7 | Rancho Palos Verdes , CA Register Today View Schedule

§ 1329

Ray, In re

Ruling: 
Court denied counsel's application for additional attorney fees as the Bankruptcy Codeforbids modification after completion of payments under the plan. (Bankr. W.D. Mich.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ray, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 01,2019, LexisNexis #0919-023

Mrdutt, In re--Derham-Burk v. Mrdutt

Ruling: 
Debtors could not modify their plan to surrender their residence as the surrender was apayment made outside the 60-month time limit. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mrdutt, In re--Derham-Burk v. Mrdutt. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 06,2019, LexisNexis #0819-020

O'Reilly, In re--Beveridge v. Vidunas

Ruling: 
Post-confirmation modification denied for lack of unanticipated change in circumstances.(Bankr. S.D. Ga.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of O'Reilly, In re--Beveridge v. Vidunas. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 18,2019, LexisNexis #0519-047

Santillan, In re

Ruling: 
Overpayment credited to balance owed under modified chapter 13 plan where the modification was retroactively effective as of the date it was filed. (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Santillan, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 26,2018, LexisNexis #1118-057

Marshall, In re

Ruling: 
Reconversion to chapter 13 was denied as the plan modification could not provide for payments over a period that expired after the applicable commitment period. (Bankr. D. Mass.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Marshall, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 20,2018, LexisNexis #1118-058

Sledge, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's motion to increase the unsecured dividend from 25 percent to 100 percent was timely as the debtor's payments to the trustee promised by her existing confirmed plan had not yet been completed. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sledge, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 27,2018, LexisNexis #1018-057

Gospodarek, In re

Ruling: 
Objection to debtors' proposed plan modification was sustained where debtors did not comply with the order that required them to pay into the plan one-half of their 2016 and 2017 tax refunds for the benefit of creditors with allowed unsecured claims. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gospodarek, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 13,2018, LexisNexis #0918-117

Helmeid, In re

Ruling: 
Modification that reduced amount of secured claim was impermissible. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Helmeid, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 22,2018, LexisNexis #0618-115

Jones, In re

Ruling: 
Plan modification granted to allow debtors to limit their payments to the amount ofdisposable income already paid. (Bankr. N.D. W. Va.)
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jones, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 05,2018, LexisNexis #0318-086

Ripley, In re

Ruling: 
Court allowed trustee's motion to modify chapter 13 plan as increasing the amount ofpayments to the unsecured class was a permissible reason for modification. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ripley, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 06,2018, LexisNexis #0318-087

Pages

Subscribe to § 1329