Rule 9022

In re Shah

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court could not extend time to appeal denial of motion despite pro se debtor's failure to receive notice of the decision.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Shah. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 25,2016, LexisNexis #0316-105

In re Heartland Mem. Hosp. LLC

Defendant physician moved for dispensation, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(c)(2), to file a notice of appeal after the date upon which the notice was required to be filed by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a). The physician's counsel asserted that the notice of appeal was not timely filed due to her excusable neglect.
Ruling: 
Counsel's incorrect docketing of order date was not excusable neglect for purposes of allowing late filing of appeal.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Heartland Mem. Hosp. LLC. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on June 21,2012, LexisNexis #1012-033
Subscribe to Rule 9022