Rule 9011(b)

Fulayter, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's motion for sanctions, costs and attorney fees denied where he failed to show that the law firm that represented him violated any of the certifications described in Rule 9011. (Bankr.E.D. Mich.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Fulayter, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 09,2020, LexisNexis #0820-100

Robbins v. Barbour (In re Futreal)

Ruling: 
Counsel sanctioned for improperly splitting fees pursuant to a sham agreement in attempt to avoid fee sharing disclosure obligations.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Robbins v. Barbour (In re Futreal). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 05,2016, LexisNexis #0616-035

In re Alonso

Ruling: 
Creditor sanctioned for filing an amended proof of claim three months before plan completion and frivolous motions that followed.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Alonso. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 17,2016, LexisNexis #0316-070

In re Sekema

Ruling: 
Creditors who filed proofs of claim that were barred by state statute of limitations sanctioned.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sekema. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 07,2015, LexisNexis #0215-105

In re Sekema

Ruling: 
Creditors who filed proofs of claim that were barred by state statute of limitations sanctioned.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sekema. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 07,2015, LexisNexis #0215-105

Meredith v. City of Camden Water & Sewer (In re Smith)

Ruling: 
Counsel admonished for failure to used electronic filing system.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Meredith v. City of Camden Water & Sewer (In re Smith). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 16,2013, LexisNexis #1013-068

In re Ruehmann

Ruling: 
Attorney sanctioned for numerous bad faith filings and failure to file fee disclosures.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ruehmann. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 05,2013, LexisNexis #1013-069

In re Johnson

Bankruptcy debtors' case was closed without a discharge based on the debtors' failure to file certificates of completion of a financial management course, and the debtors filed the certificates shortly after the case was closed. Approximately four years later, the debtors moved to reopen their bankruptcy case.
Ruling: 
Debtors could not reopen case four years after dismissal for failure to file certificates of completion of financial management course.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Johnson. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 16,2013, LexisNexis #0813-003

Robinson v. Lawrence (In re Lawrence)

Ruling: 
Creditor's attorney sanctioned for filing adversary proceeding seeking revocation of discharge after passing of deadline for objection to discharge.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Robinson v. Lawrence (In re Lawrence). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 21,2013, LexisNexis #0813-137

In re Noyola

A chapter 13 debtor filed a case with the assistance of counsel in violation of an order dismissing his prior case with prejudice to refiling for 180 days. The court issued an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed with prejudice to refiling for two years and why counsel should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with the prior court order pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011(b).
Ruling: 
Case dismissed as filed in violation of prior prejudicial dismissal order but without sanction against counsel.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Noyola. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 18,2013, LexisNexis #0213-070

Pages

Subscribe to Rule 9011(b)