§ 1329(d)

Harbin, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors' proposed plan modification was permissible due to CARES Act provision thatallowed extension of plan term for up to seven years. (Bankr. E.D. Mich.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harbin, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 27,2020, LexisNexis #0521-020

Winnegrad, In re

Ruling: 
Issues of good faith and whether debtors will be able to make all payments due were relevantto confirmation of modified plan. (Bankr. D.N.J.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Winnegrad, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 21,2021, LexisNexis #0221-095

Robinson, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's request to modify and extend her confirmed plan was denied as her plan wasoriginally confirmed four days after the enactment of the CARES Act. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Robinson, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 08,2020, LexisNexis #0121-100

Gilbert, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors' motions to modify their plan granted due to material financial hardship resultingfrom COVID-19. (Bankr. E.D. La.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gilbert, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 27,2020, LexisNexis #1120-073

Roebuck, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was not eligible to amend Chapter 13 plan to provide for a term beyond five years asthe plan had not been confirmed before the date of enactment of the CARES Act. (Bankr. W.D.Pa.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Roebuck, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 03,2020, LexisNexis #1020-045

Bridges, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor, whose Chapter 13 plan was not yet confirmed, did not qualify under CARES Actprovision to modify her plan to include a term beyond five years. (Bankr. S.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bridges, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 30,2020, LexisNexis #0920-048
Subscribe to § 1329(d)