Jun
24
2021
Lynch, In re
Ruling:
Chapter 13 plan provision for cramdown provisions of condominium association’s claimsecured by a security interest in debtor's principal residence. (Bankr. D.N.J.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lynch, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 24,2021, LexisNexis #0821-044
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Jun
14
2021
Williams, In re
Ruling:
Confirmation of proposed Chapter 13 plan was denied where plan violated theantimodification provision by modifying creditor's claim secured only by her residence.(Bankr. D.S.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Williams, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 14,2021, LexisNexis #0821-022
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Apr
14
2021
Chew, In re
Ruling:
Prepetition claim for mortgage arrears was accurate where creditor was entitled to include anescrow deficiency and an escrow shortage in the chapter 13 plan. (Bankr. E.D. Pa.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chew, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 14,2021, LexisNexis #0521-098
Sep
23
2020
Porter, In re
Ruling:
Debtors could not avoid a creditor's second mortgage on their primary residence as thepetition-date value exceeded the amount owed on the first mortgage. (Bankr. E.D. Mich.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Porter, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 23,2020, LexisNexis #1120-020
Aug
21
2020
Polvorosa, In re
Ruling:
Creditor's allocation of loan payments received under plan was not grounds for contemptabsent violation of a specific plan provision. (Bankr. D. Nev.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Polvorosa, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 21,2020, LexisNexis #1020-019
Jun
09
2020
Bozeman, In re
Ruling:
Chapter 13 debtor was entitled to discharge as all allowed claims were paid in full andobjection to late amended claim of mortgagee was sustained. (Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bozeman, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 09,2020, LexisNexis #0720-072
Jun
09
2020
Womack, In re
Ruling:
Pawnshop's rights were subject to modification in proposed plan as the debtor’s contract hadnot matured as of the petition date. (Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Womack, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 09,2020, LexisNexis #0720-073
Mar
20
2020
Revels, In re
Ruling:
Confirmation of plan was denied as it include a provision that was inconsistent with theBankruptcy Code. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Revels, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 20,2020, LexisNexis #0520-047
Mar
10
2020
Mank, In re
Ruling:
Confirmation of amended plan denied as its contents include nonstandard provisions thatwere not specific to the debtor's financial circumstances. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mank, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 10,2020, LexisNexis #0420-095
Feb
04
2020
Bennett, In re
Ruling:
Separate classification of student loan claims and adoption of a permissible standard for fairdiscrimination in favor of student loan claims was unfairly discriminatory and prohibited.(Bankr. N.D.N.Y.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bennett, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 04,2020, LexisNexis #0320-045
Pages
