§ 455

Buchholz, In re

Ruling: 
Motion to recuse or disqualify denied as counsel's belief that he was entitled to the full nolook fee in all Chapter 13 cases was not a justification for a collateral attack on a court'sdecision. (Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Buchholz, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 01,2022, LexisNexis #1122-097

Krichevsky, In re

Ruling: 
Motion to recuse denied as debtor had not established a basis to conclude, or even questionseriously, the bankruptcy court's impartiality. (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Krichevsky, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 25,2022, LexisNexis #0622-071

Vascular Access Ctrs., L.P, In re

Ruling: 
Recusal motion was denied because moving parties had known of the circumstances whichthey alleged suggested possible bias or prejudice but only raised them, for the first time, 14months later. (Bankr. E.D. Pa.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Vascular Access Ctrs., L.P, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on June 25,2021, LexisNexis #0821-047

Hart, In re

Ruling: 
Fact that bankruptcy judge's former law partner represented a creditor in unrelated matterswas not grounds for refusal. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hart, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 23,2021, LexisNexis #0721-069

Calixtro, In re

Ruling: 
Motion for reconsideration was denied where court did not have a financial interest in theparties and was not required to disqualify itself. (Bankr. C.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Calixtro, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 02,2020, LexisNexis #0221-096

Greenfield, In re

Ruling: 
Recusal of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy judge was not warraned as judicial rulings in the case didnot establish bias for recusal. (Bankr. D. Idaho)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Greenfield, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 22,2020, LexisNexis #1220-048

Gamboa, In re--Matthews v. Gamboa

Ruling: 
Lawyer plaintiff's motion to disqualify was denied because the fact that he believed he wastreated unfairly did not give rise to the court's disqualification. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gamboa, In re--Matthews v. Gamboa. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 17,2020, LexisNexis #0920-098

Fetner, In re--McCarthy v. Hotel Street Capital, LLC

Ruling: 
Debtor's motion for recusal was denied where debtor presented no facts or objectivearguments that reasonably demonstrated the court's prejudice or bias. (Bankr. E.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Fetner, In re--McCarthy v. Hotel Street Capital, LLC. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 05,2020, LexisNexis #0420-074

Hrn Group, In re

Ruling: 
Court's legal error in lifting stay did not justify recusal. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hrn Group, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on November 13,2019, LexisNexis #1219-096

Samuel, In re

Ruling: 
Husband and wife who declared bankruptcy failed to show grounds for recusing the judgewho was assigned to their case as there was no merit to the debtors' claims that the judge wasbiased against them. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Samuel, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 07,2018, LexisNexis #1018-085

Pages

Subscribe to § 455