§ 522(d)(1)

Raessler, In re

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court looked to legislative history to apply state exemption in absence of highcourt ruling. (Bankr. D. Me.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Raessler, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 10,2020, LexisNexis #0220-055

Maresca, In re--Maresca v. Donovan

Ruling: 
Court granted motion to avoid lien impairing exemption in property used as a residence by adependent of the debtor. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Maresca, In re--Maresca v. Donovan. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 28,2018, LexisNexis #0818-005

Maresca, In re--Maresca v. Donovan

Ruling: 
Court granted motion to avoid lien impairing exemption in property used as a residence by adependent of the debtor. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Maresca, In re--Maresca v. Donovan. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 28,2018, LexisNexis #0818-005

Faulring, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's claim of an exemption could not extend to the separate dwelling that he rented to athird party or the undeveloped property that adjoined the lot on which he resided. (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Faulring, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 30,2017, LexisNexis #1017-075

Tankersley, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors could not claim a property exempt as their residence as they did not reside norintended to reside on the property. (Bankr. E.D. Ark.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tankersley, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 28,2017, LexisNexis #1017-011

Broderick, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's objection to debtor's claim of exemption in property overruled as debtor met herburden to establish constructive use of the property in question as residence. (Bankr. D. Mass.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Broderick, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 31,2017, LexisNexis #0317-011

Sikirica v. Yanovich (In re Yanovich)

Ruling: 
Debtor allowed homestead exemption in property debtor was moving into on petition date due to foreclosure of prior residence.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sikirica v. Yanovich (In re Yanovich). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 01,2016, LexisNexis #0416-013

In re Bradigan

Ruling: 
Debtor entitled to exemption in one half of equity in property held by the entireties with non- debtor spouse.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bradigan. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 29,2013, LexisNexis #1213-078

In re Stoner

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and claimed that an interest in a house he inherited from his father was exempt from creditors' claim under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(d)(1). A trustee who was appointed to administer the debtor's case filed an objection to the debtor's claim.
Ruling: 
Interest in house inherited by debtor from father and then sold was not eligible for homestead exemption.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Stoner. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 06,2013, LexisNexis #0413-048

Pages

Subscribe to § 522(d)(1)