§ 522(c)

Hutchinson, In re--Hutchinson v. United States

Ruling: 
Chapter 7 debtors not permitted to avoid tax liens from otherwise exempt property, even if the said tax lien could be avoided by a trustee under law. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hutchinson, In re--Hutchinson v. United States. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 02,2018, LexisNexis #0218-039

Awayda, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's objection to debtor's claim of exemption denied as the exemption was validlyclaimed as of the petition date. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Awayda, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 18,2017, LexisNexis #1117-100

Ortiz-Peredo, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's objection to the debtors' chapter 13 plan granted as proceeds received by debtor from a settlement qualified as projected disposable income. (Bankr. W.D. Tex.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ortiz-Peredo, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 18,2017, LexisNexis #0817-099

In re Arellano

Ruling: 
State law exemption of omitted assets allowed over trustee's bad faith objection.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Arellano. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 26,2014, LexisNexis #1114-016

In re Hannon

Ruling: 
IRS was not entitled to proceeds of sale of debtors' fully encumbered property in which debtor had claimed a homestead exemption.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hannon. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 09,2014, LexisNexis #0814-007

In re Kyle

Ruling: 
Objection to state homestead exemption based on uncodified language regarding effective date of amendment increasing limit denied.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kyle. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 14,2014, LexisNexis #0614-012

Viegelahn v. Frost (In re Frost)

Ruling: 
Proceeds of sale of debtor's exempt homestead reverted to the estate after expiration of state law exemption.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Viegelahn v. Frost (In re Frost). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 05,2014, LexisNexis #0314-114

In re Bryant

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 7 and received a discharge. The debtor filed a motion for relief from a post-discharge offset sought by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The debtor claimed that his discharge precluded the IRS from offsetting a prepetition refund with a prepetition liability.
Ruling: 
Discharge did not preclude IRS from offsetting prepetition refund with prepetition liability.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bryant. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 13,2009, LexisNexis #0209-098

In re Lie Hung Tan

A liquidating trustee in a bankruptcy case objected to the proofs of claim filed by a debtor's sister.
Ruling: 
Debtor's sister could not claim homestead exemption in or administrative expense related to estate property.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lie Hung Tan. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 06,2008, LexisNexis #0408-066

Pasquina v. Cunningham (In re Cunningham)

In a bankruptcy case, appellant creditor sought review of a decision of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts, which held that the postpetition sale of appellee debtor's home, for which he had obtained a homestead exemption under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 188, § 1, protecting it from creditors, did not cause the proceeds of the sale to lose their exempt status under the Bankruptcy Code and become subject to a prepetition debt.
Ruling: 
Proceeds of sale of exempt homestead were not subject to nondischargeable claim by creditor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pasquina v. Cunningham (In re Cunningham). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 22,2008, LexisNexis #0208-065

Pages

Subscribe to § 522(c)