Sep
21
2020
Alexander, In re--Munding v. Meade
Ruling:
Court determined that the services performed and costs incurred by a Chapter 7 debtor'sattorney provided a certain value and her proof of claim was secured. (Bankr. E.D. Wash.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Alexander, In re--Munding v. Meade. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 21,2020, LexisNexis #1120-005
Aug
27
2020
Jackson, In re--Jackson v. GSO Bus. Mgmt., LLC
Ruling:
Summary judgment in favor of debtor’s replacement tax professionals against debtor’soriginal professionals denied given facts in dispute. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jackson, In re--Jackson v. GSO Bus. Mgmt., LLC. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 27,2020, LexisNexis #1020-031
Apr
24
2020
Ciampa, In re
Ruling:
Order that debtor pay his former wife's debt for her daughter's student loans was a domesticsupport obligation and therefore entitled to priority status. (Bankr. D. Mass.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ciampa, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 24,2020, LexisNexis #0620-034
Mar
31
2020
Wilson, In re--Cabrera v. Wilson
Ruling:
Objection to claim sustained where "shared responsibility payment" did not qualify as anexcise tax on a transaction. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wilson, In re--Cabrera v. Wilson. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 31,2020, LexisNexis #0520-061
Feb
27
2020
Worley & Obetz, In re
Ruling:
Trustee's objections to certain proof of claim were overruled as the claims constituted"deposits" and were entitled to priority status. (Bankr. E.D. Pa.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Worley & Obetz, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 27,2020, LexisNexis #0420-035
Jan
03
2020
LaSpina, In re
Ruling:
Debtor's claim entitled to priority treatment where special master intended part of the awardto serve as a domestic support obligation. (Bankr. E.D. Pa.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of LaSpina, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 03,2020, LexisNexis #0220-037
Oct
02
2013
FAH Liquidating Corp., In re--Etzelsberger v. Fisker Auto. Holdings, Inc.
Ruling:
Creditor and the WARN Class were entitled to priority treatment of their claims where debtorexperienced a "cessation of business" under §§ 507(a)(4) and (a)(5). (Bankr. D. Del.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of FAH Liquidating Corp., In re--Etzelsberger v. Fisker Auto. Holdings, Inc.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on October 02,2013, LexisNexis #0220-038
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Nov
27
2019
Stuteville, In re
Ruling:
Objection to claim overruled where debt constituted an allowed domestic support obligationclaim entitled to first priority treatment. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stuteville, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 27,2019, LexisNexis #0120-037
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Nov
25
2019
Miller, In re
Ruling:
Former landlord of Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to a priority claim for an unpaidsecurity deposit under a residential lease. (Bankr. S.D. Ala.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Miller, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 25,2019, LexisNexis #0120-010
Nov
12
2019
Steenes, In re
Ruling:
Bankruptcy and district courts erred in finding that the vehicular fines were notadministrative expenses entitled to priority payment under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(2). (7th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Steenes, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 12,2019, LexisNexis #1219-082
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Pages
