§ 507

Alexander, In re--Munding v. Meade

Ruling: 
Court determined that the services performed and costs incurred by a Chapter 7 debtor'sattorney provided a certain value and her proof of claim was secured. (Bankr. E.D. Wash.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Alexander, In re--Munding v. Meade. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 21,2020, LexisNexis #1120-005

Jackson, In re--Jackson v. GSO Bus. Mgmt., LLC

Ruling: 
Summary judgment in favor of debtor’s replacement tax professionals against debtor’soriginal professionals denied given facts in dispute. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jackson, In re--Jackson v. GSO Bus. Mgmt., LLC. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 27,2020, LexisNexis #1020-031

Ciampa, In re

Ruling: 
Order that debtor pay his former wife's debt for her daughter's student loans was a domesticsupport obligation and therefore entitled to priority status. (Bankr. D. Mass.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ciampa, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 24,2020, LexisNexis #0620-034

Wilson, In re--Cabrera v. Wilson

Ruling: 
Objection to claim sustained where "shared responsibility payment" did not qualify as anexcise tax on a transaction. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wilson, In re--Cabrera v. Wilson. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 31,2020, LexisNexis #0520-061

TelexFree, In re--Darr v. United States

Ruling: 
IRS's post-petition erroneous refund related to its pre-petition tax claim and was not anadministrative expense claim. (Bankr. D. Mass.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of TelexFree, In re--Darr v. United States. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on March 26,2020, LexisNexis #0520-029

Worley & Obetz, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's objections to certain proof of claim were overruled as the claims constituted"deposits" and were entitled to priority status. (Bankr. E.D. Pa.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Worley & Obetz, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 27,2020, LexisNexis #0420-035

LaSpina, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's claim entitled to priority treatment where special master intended part of the awardto serve as a domestic support obligation. (Bankr. E.D. Pa.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of LaSpina, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 03,2020, LexisNexis #0220-037

FAH Liquidating Corp., In re--Etzelsberger v. Fisker Auto. Holdings, Inc.

Ruling: 
Creditor and the WARN Class were entitled to priority treatment of their claims where debtorexperienced a "cessation of business" under §§ 507(a)(4) and (a)(5). (Bankr. D. Del.)
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of FAH Liquidating Corp., In re--Etzelsberger v. Fisker Auto. Holdings, Inc.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on October 02,2013, LexisNexis #0220-038

Stuteville, In re

Ruling: 
Objection to claim overruled where debt constituted an allowed domestic support obligationclaim entitled to first priority treatment. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stuteville, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 27,2019, LexisNexis #0120-037

Miller, In re

Ruling: 
Former landlord of Chapter 13 debtor was not entitled to a priority claim for an unpaidsecurity deposit under a residential lease. (Bankr. S.D. Ala.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Miller, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 25,2019, LexisNexis #0120-010

Pages

Subscribe to § 507