§ 362(c)

McLachlan, In re

Ruling: 
Motion to extend automatic stay was denied because of debtor's bad faith due to recklessgambling, nonperformance in previous cases and repetitive filings which demonstrated anabuse to the provisions. (Bankr. N.D. Iowa)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McLachlan, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 25,2021, LexisNexis #0421-003

Ramsey, In re

Ruling: 
Continuance of automatic stay in debtor’s second case within one year was denied because thedebtor failed to rebut the presumption of lack of good faith. (Bankr. D. Nev.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ramsey, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 17,2021, LexisNexis #0421-004

Bradshaw, In re

Ruling: 
Sale of property was barred by the automatic stay (Bankr. D. Kan.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bradshaw, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 09,2020, LexisNexis #0121-055

Kalinina, In re

Ruling: 
Imposition of stay denied in debtor's third Chapter 11 case within one year as it was filed forthe sole purpose of delaying the creditor. (Bankr. D. Me.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kalinina, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 08,2020, LexisNexis #1120-79

Valiente, In re

Ruling: 
Automatic stay terminated with respect to debtors but continued to stay efforts to obtain estateproperty where debtors filed a second Chapter 13 case within a year after their first one wasdismissed. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Valiente, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 02,2020, LexisNexis #1120-052

Arroyo, In re

Ruling: 
The entire automatic stay terminates after 30 days for second-time filers, so state courtjudgment was not in violation. (Bankr. D.P.R.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Arroyo, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 13,2020, LexisNexis #0920-081

Dear, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's motion for imposition of automatic stay in third case filed after two dismissals wasgranted where he filed the petition in good faith with clear and convincing evidence. (Bankr.D. Kan.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dear, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 10,2020, LexisNexis #0920-054

Guilford, In re

Ruling: 
Stay remained in place as to property of the estate while the stay as to the debtor expired thirtydays after the petition date. (Bankr. D.N.J.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Guilford, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 28,2020, LexisNexis #0920-004

Dao, In re

Ruling: 
Court granted Chapter 7 trustee's 11 U.S.C. § 362(h)(2) motion so as to preserve the automaticstay with respect to personal property of the estate of the individual debtor. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dao, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 11,2020, LexisNexis #0620-080

Cook, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's request to impose the stay retroactively was denied as the court did not haveauthority under 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) to override 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(4)(C). (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cook, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 11,2020, LexisNexis #0620-081

Pages

Subscribe to § 362(c)