§ 524(k)(5)

In re Barron

A creditor filed a pro se motion to approve debtors' reaffirmation agreement on a motor vehicle.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement was unenforceable due to debtor's counsel's failure to provide requisite endorsement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Barron. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 14,2010, LexisNexis #0111-088

In re Bazzarelli

A debtor and a creditor proposed an amended reaffirmation agreement.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement ineffective due to attorney's failure to check box on Part C and debtor's failure to complete Part D.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bazzarelli. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 23,2008, LexisNexis #0708-118

In re Bekric

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtor and a creditor submitted a proposed reaffirmation agreement.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement could not be approved where debtor's counsel failed to complete the required certification.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bekric. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 14,2008, LexisNexis #0608-115

In re King

A debtor and a creditor proposed a reaffirmation agreement.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement was not effective due to debtor's failure to complete Part D statement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re King. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 06,2008, LexisNexis #0408-114
Subscribe to § 524(k)(5)