§ 524(k)

In re Barron

A creditor filed a pro se motion to approve debtors' reaffirmation agreement on a motor vehicle.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement was unenforceable due to debtor's counsel's failure to provide requisite endorsement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Barron. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 14,2010, LexisNexis #0111-088

In re Bazzarelli

A debtor and a creditor proposed an amended reaffirmation agreement.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement ineffective due to attorney's failure to check box on Part C and debtor's failure to complete Part D.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bazzarelli. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 23,2008, LexisNexis #0708-118

In re Bekric

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtor and a creditor submitted a proposed reaffirmation agreement.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement could not be approved where debtor's counsel failed to complete the required certification.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bekric. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 14,2008, LexisNexis #0608-115

In re King

A debtor and a creditor proposed a reaffirmation agreement.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement was not effective due to debtor's failure to complete Part D statement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re King. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 06,2008, LexisNexis #0408-114

In re Rivas

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtor and the bank submitted a proposed reaffirmation agreement pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 524.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement not effective due to presumption of undue hardship and lack of counsel's certification.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rivas. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 03,2008, LexisNexis #0508-013

In re Reardon

Chapter 11 debtor filed a motion seeking approval of a reaffirmation agreement, which was substantially in the form issued by the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to implement the requirements of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-8. ("BAPCPA"). The form also complied with the court's Administrative Order 4008-1 (AO 4008-1).
Ruling: 
Court did not approve reaffirmation agreement because it did not contain any identification of identity of creditor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Reardon. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Quintero

Petitioner debtor requested approval of her reaffirmation agreement with a secured creditor.
Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement was not approved and creditor was prohibited from repossessing car since agreement did not meet disclosure requirements of section 524(k).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Quintero. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Subscribe to § 524(k)