Winter Leadership Conference | December 5-7 | Rancho Palos Verdes , CA Register Today View Schedule

§ 547(b)(4)(A)

Rock Branch Mech., In re

Ruling: 
Trustee was entitled to summary judgment insofar as he sought to avoid the securitycompany's recordation of its security interest. (Bankr. S.D. W. Va.)
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rock Branch Mech., In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on September 09,2016, LexisNexis #0519-037

Rentas v. Aguadilla Shopping Ctr. Inc. (In re PMC Mktg. Corp.)

Ruling: 
Check issued and cashed outside of preference period was not an avoidable preference.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rentas v. Aguadilla Shopping Ctr. Inc. (In re PMC Mktg. Corp.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on January 15,2014, LexisNexis #0214-024

Kotoshirodo v. Brennan (In re Lull)

Chapter 7 trustee filed a complaint against defendant creditor to recover avoidable preferential transfers from the debtor to the creditor under 11 U.S.C.S. § 547(b). The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. At a previous hearing, the trustee's motion was granted as to all elements of avoidable preferences except for the question of whether the creditor was an "insider" as defined in 11 U.S.C.S. § 101(31).
Ruling: 
Transferee, owner of LLC, of which debtor Ponzi scheme operator's corporation was majority member and co-owner, was an insider, entitling trustee to extended reach back.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kotoshirodo v. Brennan (In re Lull). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 26,2011, LexisNexis #0511-090

Tardiff v. MBNA Am. Bank (In re Kepley)

Chapter 7 trustee brought an adversary proceeding against a creditor, alleging that a payment by the debtor prior to the bankruptcy filing was a voidable preference under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b)(4)(A). The parties cross-moved for summary judgment.
Ruling: 
Payment to creditor with funds held by debtor and spouse as tenants by the entirety was not avoidable.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tardiff v. MBNA Am. Bank (In re Kepley). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Subscribe to § 547(b)(4)(A)