§ 1322(b)(11)

Revels, In re

Ruling: 
Confirmation of plan was denied as it include a provision that was inconsistent with theBankruptcy Code. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Revels, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 20,2020, LexisNexis #0520-047

Mank, In re

Ruling: 
Confirmation of amended plan denied as its contents include nonstandard provisions thatwere not specific to the debtor's financial circumstances. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mank, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 10,2020, LexisNexis #0420-095

In re Fielding

Ruling: 
Debtors could apply proceeds from the sale of an exempt asset to tax debt owed to the IRS at their own discretion.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fielding. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 09,2015, LexisNexis #0515-029

In re Soto

When a chapter 13 plan proposed by debtors, a married couple, included language requiring secured lenders, presumably including objector bank, to provide debtors with certain periodic information as to the status of the mortgage obligation, the lender objected. Issues included the relationship of the proposed language to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002.1 and whether 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(b)(11) authorized inclusion of such a provision.
Ruling: 
Plan could not include language requiring periodic status reports by secured lenders.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Soto. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 26,2013, LexisNexis #0213-099

In re Paquette

This matter was before the court on a mortgage creditor's Objection to Confirmation of Debtors' proposed Chapter 13 plan.
Ruling: 
Objection to confirmation of plan including 180-day limit to amend deficiency claims overruled.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Paquette. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 21,2011, LexisNexis #1211-059
Subscribe to § 1322(b)(11)