Search Opinion

Cushman, In re--Resurgent Capital Servs., L.P. v. Harrington

Ruling: 
Plaintiff met its burden of showing that its adversary proceeding seeking a judgmentdeclaring that it was not subject to sanctions for filing a proof of claim on behalf of a creditorwas ripe for adjudication even though it has changed that business practice and the issue hadbeen raised in other courts. (Bankr. D. Me.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cushman, In re--Resurgent Capital Servs., L.P. v. Harrington. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 01,2017, LexisNexis #0417-022