Search Opinion

Nosek v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co. (In re Nosek)

The court issued an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011 for apparent misrepresentations as to the status of a lender as the holder of the note and mortgage at issue in the case. The order was directed at the lender, the law firm that served as its local law firm, three of its attorneys, the law firm that served as its national law firm, one of its attorneys, and the existing mortgage holder.
Ruling: 
Lender and counsel sanctioned for misrepresentation of status with regard to note and mortgage.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nosek v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co. (In re Nosek). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 25,2008, LexisNexis #0608-035