Search Opinion

In re Maisel

Creditor filed a motion for relief from the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) on the grounds that the debtors had failed to make regular monthly mortgage payments to the lender and had not sought to cure the arrearage or reaffirm the debt. The creditor further sought relief under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(2) on the grounds that the debtors had no equity in the property and the property was not necessary to an effective reorganization.
Ruling: 
Creditor's motion for relief from stay granted where debtor intended to surrender property.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Maisel. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 15,2007, LexisNexis #1207-073

In re Kemp

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 13, and the debtor submitted a proposed amended chapter 13 plan. A chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the amended plan on the grounds that the amended plan did not commit all of the debtor's projected disposable income as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B).
Ruling: 
Confirmation of amended plan denied due to above median debtors failure to commit all monthly disposable income.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kemp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 09,2007, LexisNexis #0108-018