Search Opinion

Henson v. Bank of Am. (In re Henson)

Plaintiff chapter 13 debtors filed a complaint against defendant bank alleging that the bank violated the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a), by allowing a prepetition foreclosure sale date to be continued automatically, from week to week by a public trustee. The bank filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.
Ruling: 
Automatic postpetition week-to-week continuation of foreclosure sale did not violate stay.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Henson v. Bank of Am. (In re Henson). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 11,2012, LexisNexis #1012-044

In re Henderson

This matter came before the court on debtors' Motion to Confirm Chapter 13 Plan and the Objection of the Chapter 13 trustee.
Ruling: 
Debtors' whose prior case was dismissed postdischarge were not eligible for a second discharge.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Henderson. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 06,2012, LexisNexis #0612-108

In re Whetten

The United States Trustee filed a motion to covert or dismiss the debtors' chapter 11 cases under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1112(b)(4).
Ruling: 
Case dismissed due to failure to file plan, submit monthly reports of pay quarterly fees.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Whetten. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 05,2012, LexisNexis #0612-131

In re Kuch

Debtors filed a petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, but their case was dismissed. The debtors filed a letter with the court which contained allegations of misconduct against a person they hired to help them file their case, and the court reopened the case and issued an order to that person and a business he operated to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for violating 11 U.S.C.S. § 110.
Ruling: 
Bankruptcy petition preparer sanctioned for multiple violations.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kuch. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 12,2012, LexisNexis #0412-005