Search Opinion

They Might Be Inc. v. Carter (In re Carter)

Ruling: 
Dismissed adversary proceeding could be reopened as counsel's calendaring was excusable neglect and lack of prejudice to debtor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of They Might Be Inc. v. Carter (In re Carter). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 05,2015, LexisNexis #1215-033

Stuart v. Mendenall (In re Mendenall)

Ruling: 
Extension of time to file nondischargeability proceeding ran from original deadline, not date of order.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stuart v. Mendenall (In re Mendenall). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 31,2013, LexisNexis #0813-104

XOpen Co. Ltd. v. Gray (In re Gray)

Plaintiff creditor filed a dischargeability action against defendant debtor, who filed a motion to dismiss the complaint as untimely.
Ruling: 
Nondischargeability proceeding filed on Monday dismissed as untimely where deadline had been extended to fixed date of preceding Sunday.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of XOpen Co. Ltd. v. Gray (In re Gray). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 10,2013, LexisNexis #0813-103

Dillworth v. Vieweg (In re Vieweg)

In a voluntary chapter 7 case, plaintiff trustee obtained five extensions on the time to file a complaint objecting to discharge. After the trustee's complaint was filed, defendant debtors moved to dismiss the complaint as untimely.
Ruling: 
Nondischargeability proceeding dismissed as filed after expiration of extension of time to file.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dillworth v. Vieweg (In re Vieweg). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 26,2011, LexisNexis #0112-069