Search Opinion

In re Marathe

Movant, the daughter of the debtors, sought reconsideration of a court order that granted the chapter 7 trustee's motion to conduct a Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004 examination of the daughter, and for a protective order. The daughter asserted that the proposed examination was impermissible because it violated her rights under the due process clause of the United States Constitution.
Ruling: 
Rule 2004 examination properly extended to debtor's daughter.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Marathe. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 10,2011, LexisNexis #0112-031

In re Kelton

A chapter 13 debtor filed a motion to strike an auditor's report, which had been prepared pursuant to § 603 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-8, § 603, 119 Stat. 23, 122 (2005), and 28 U.S.C.S. § 586(f). The United States Trustee filed a motion for a Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004 examination. The debtor filed a motion for a protective order.
Ruling: 
Motion to strike auditor's report denied and Rule 2004 examination ordered.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kelton. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 13,2008, LexisNexis #0708-025