Search Opinion

Machevsky, In re

Ruling: 
Creditor was not entitled to an administrative expense claim because substantial contributionclaims were not allowable in Chapter 7 cases. (Bankr. C.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Machevsky, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 23,2021, LexisNexis #1021-032

Stoddard, In re--Carter v. Stoddard

Ruling: 
Debt was dischargeable because debtor's medical recommendations might have been made inerror, he did not know them to be false and did not make them to deceive the creditors or asfraudulent misrepresentations. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stoddard, In re--Carter v. Stoddard. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 23,2021, LexisNexis #1021-033

Campbell, In re

Ruling: 
Motion for disgorgement granted in part because counsel failed to disclose first fee agreementand payments made to him and tardily filed the succeeding fee agreements. (Bankr. D. Or.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Campbell, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 11,2021, LexisNexis #0921-080

Pickett, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was not entitled to estate funds that remained on deposit simply because a creditor didnot cash its distribution check. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pickett, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 11,2021, LexisNexis #0921-095

Heard, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was entitled to an award of attorney fees because a bank's notice indicating that thedebtor's escrow payments were increasing was inaccurate. (Bankr. D. Or.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Heard, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 11,2021, LexisNexis #0921-100

Chatha, In re--Whatley v. Chatha

Ruling: 
Debtor-initiated transfers were avoidable as they were made without the trustee's consent andnot authorized by the court. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chatha, In re--Whatley v. Chatha. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 09,2021, LexisNexis #0921-094

Copeland, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's motion to reopen his case was denied because it would be pointless to reopen thecase to attempt to avoid the deed of trust which was recorded against the property to secure thecredit authorized by a financing order. (Bankr. C.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Copeland, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 30,2021, LexisNexis #0921-029

Duran, In re

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy case dismissed because debtor misrepresented facts in his petition and unfairlymanipulated the bankruptcy code in inequitable manner. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Duran, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 27,2021, LexisNexis #0921-028

Gutierrez, In re--Gutierrez v. Or. Dep't of Corr.

Ruling: 
Debtor's motion for waiver of the appellate filing fee was granted in absence of bad faith.(Bankr. D. Idaho)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gutierrez, In re--Gutierrez v. Or. Dep't of Corr.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 09,2021, LexisNexis #0821-073

Moore v. Reis (In re Moore)

Ruling: 
Debtors were barred from bringing their claims for violation of the stay in their Hawaiibankruptcy as the stay against debtor wife expired 30 days after filing. (Bankr. W.D. Wash.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moore v. Reis (In re Moore). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 08,2021, LexisNexis #0821-054

Pages