Search Opinion

In re Cleveland

Claimants were engaged in the business of purchasing and servicing unsecured bankruptcy receivables through blanket assignments, and the claimants filed proofs of claim in debtors' bankruptcies. The debtors objected to the proofs of claim on the grounds that the claimants did not establish legal ownership of the debts and that the claims were unenforceable under state law.
Ruling: 
Purchaser and servicer of unsecured bankruptcy receivables sufficiently established ownership of claims objected to by debtors.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cleveland. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 30,2008, LexisNexis #1108-006

In re Hale-Halsell Co.

Counsel for a committee of unsecured creditors of a chapter 11 debtor filed a motion for approval of its compromise with the United States Trustee, which sought to adjust a fee arrangement under 11 U.S.C.S. § 328(a) to increase the amount of compensation paid to it.
Ruling: 
Creditor's committee's counsel's application for enhanced fee denied.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hale-Halsell Co.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on July 01,2008, LexisNexis #0808-057

In re Chalakee

Creditors filed proofs of claim asserting that bankruptcy debtors owed credit card debt to the creditors, and the debtors objected to the creditors' claims on the ground that the amounts claimed to be owed were disputed.
Ruling: 
Debtors' objections to creditors' proofs of claim for credit card debt overruled.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Chalakee. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 27,2008, LexisNexis #0408-008

In re Engles

When a reaffirmation agreement for a vehicle loan was not executed or filed by a creditor, that debt was discharged. The debtors filed a motion for relief from the discharge order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) or (6) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024 and a request for approval of the reaffirmation agreement.
Ruling: 
Debtors could not obtain revocation of own discharge.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Engles. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 27,2008, LexisNexis #0408-017