Search Opinion

Arnott v. IRS (In re Arnott)

Movant debtors filed an objection to a proof of claim filed by respondent IRS, and the IRS argued that the objection should be dismissed. The IRS asserted that the debtors did not name the property party respondent, that the United States was not properly served, and that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the objection.
Objection to proof of claim properly named and was served upon IRS.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Arnott v. IRS (In re Arnott). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 18,2008, LexisNexis #0708-096