Rallo, In re

Motion to extend the stay was denied because the debtor had not offered clear and convincingevidence to rebut the presumption that the case was not filed in good faith and debtor had notfiled a plan. (Bankr. D. Me.)
Automatic Stay; Duration; Cases Refiled Within One Year of Dismissal of One Prior
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rallo, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 02,2021, LexisNexis #0821-055