Guice, In re

Ruling: 
Anti-modification protections did not apply to debtor's proposed cramdown as creditor wassecured by both a security interest and a judgment lien against the debtor's condo. (Bankr.D.N.J.)
Issue: 
Contents of Plan; Discretionary Provisions; Modification of Claimholders’ Rights.
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Guice, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 28,2019, LexisNexis #0419-043