Winter Leadership Conference | December 5-7 | Rancho Palos Verdes , CA Register Today View Schedule

Maxus Energy Corp. v. YPF S.A.

Court denied motion for mandatory abstention with respect to claims for unjust enrichment,alter ego, and civil conspiracy as they arose under the same events as the trustee's fraudulenttransfer claims. (Bankr. D. Del.)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Mandatory Abstention.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Maxus Energy Corp. v. YPF S.A.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on February 25,2019, LexisNexis #0419-023