Annual Spring Meeting | April 11-14 | Washington, D.C. Register Today View Schedule

In re Grisham

Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement disapproved due to failure to rebut presumption of undue hardship.
Procedural posture: 
A bankruptcy debtor proposed a reaffirmation agreement in which the debtor would reaffirm a debt to a creditor secured by the debtor's vehicle. Since the agreement raised a presumption of undue hardship based on the debtor's expenses in excess of income, the bankruptcy court conducted a hearing concerning approval of the agreement.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Grisham. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 07,2010, LexisNexis #1010-019