Park v. Chan (In re Chan)

Creditor's investment in debtor's business was nondischargeable due to debtor's misrepresentations.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff creditor filed an adversary proceeding against defendant chapter 7 debtor, seeking a judgment that the debtor had to repay money the creditor invested in the debtor's business, and a judgment that the debt was excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(2)(B), (a)(4), (a)(6) and (a)(19). The debtor contested her liability and the nondischargeability of the debt, and she filed a counterclaim and a third-party complaint.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Park v. Chan (In re Chan). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 30,2008, LexisNexis #0209-117