Lehms Omaha LLC v. Stanley (In re Stanley)

Ruling: 
Debt resulting from creditor buyer's payment of lien on equipment not disclosed by debtor at the time of sale was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff creditor filed this adversary proceeding pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A) to contest the dischargeability of a debt that arose from its payment of a lien against equipment sold to it by defendant debtor. The matter was before the court for decision.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lehms Omaha LLC v. Stanley (In re Stanley). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 25,2012, LexisNexis #1012-084