In re Hardacre

Pre 2005-Act: 
Pre 2005-Act
Plan confirmation was denied since the debtor had made a double deduction for mortgage and car loan expenses in calculating projected disposable income.
Procedural posture: 
A bankruptcy debtor proposed a chapter 13 plan that provided no return to her unsecured creditors. The trustee objected to confirmation of the plan on the ground that the debtor impermissibly deducted her mortgage and car loan expenses twice under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2)(A)(i) in calculating her disposable income.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hardacre. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member