Henson v. Bank of Am. (In re Henson)

Automatic postpetition week-to-week continuation of foreclosure sale did not violate stay.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff chapter 13 debtors filed a complaint against defendant bank alleging that the bank violated the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a), by allowing a prepetition foreclosure sale date to be continued automatically, from week to week by a public trustee. The bank filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Henson v. Bank of Am. (In re Henson). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 11,2012, LexisNexis #1012-044