French v. Cahill (In re Cahill)

Economic stimulus rebate was property of the estate as debtor filed petition after effective date of Stimulus Act.
Procedural posture: 
Defendant debtors filed a petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and plaintiff trustee was appointed to represent the bankruptcy estate. The trustee filed an action against the debtors, seeking a judgment declaring that an Economic Stimulus Rebate (ESR) in the amount of $ 1,200 the debtors received from the government was property of the debtors'bankruptcy estate. The trustee filed a motion for summary judgment.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of French v. Cahill (In re Cahill). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 30,2008, LexisNexis #0209-119