In re Rascento

Case dismissed due to failure of chapter 13 plan to provide for better recovery than in chapter 7 and debtor's failure to appear.
Procedural posture: 
The chapter 13 debtor objected to a claim filed by the bank that held the mortgage on his residence, contending that the bank could not prove that it was the true owner of the note and that the note had been paid in full. The bank moved for relief from the automatic stay. The bankruptcy trustee moved to dismiss the bankruptcy, asserting that the debtor's plan did not comply with 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 1322 and 1325.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rascento. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 22,2008, LexisNexis #1208-026